Register
Shop Now
  • Educational

Token Allowances: Revoking Permissions and Preventing Draining Attacks

TOKEN SECURITY

Understanding Token Allowances: Revoking Permissions and Preventing Draining Attacks

How ERC-20 approve() Creates Vulnerabilities and How to Protect Your Assets

Token allowances are one of the most misunderstood and exploited features in DeFi. The ERC-20 approve() function enables users to grant smart contracts permission to spend tokens on their behalf—essential for DEX swaps, lending protocols, and most DeFi interactions. However, granting unlimited approvals to malicious or compromised contracts has resulted in over $2 billion in stolen funds since 2020.

Understanding how token allowances work, recognizing the risks of unlimited approvals, and knowing how to audit and revoke dangerous permissions is essential for anyone holding ERC-20 tokens. This guide provides technical depth on the approve() mechanism and practical, step-by-step instructions for protecting your assets using block explorer tools.

⚠️ The $2 Billion Approval Problem

Attack Statistics (2020-2024):

  • $2B+ stolen via approval exploits: Malicious contracts drain tokens after users grant spending permissions
  • Common vectors: Phishing sites requesting approvals, compromised dApps, fake token contracts, rug pulls
  • Unlimited approvals: Users routinely grant 2^256-1 allowance (infinite) to save gas—creates permanent vulnerability
  • Forgotten approvals: Average user has 50-100 active approvals they’ve forgotten about—each a potential attack surface

Critical Insight: Every approval you grant is a permanent permission until revoked. Old, forgotten approvals to compromised or malicious contracts can drain your tokens years later. Regular approval audits are essential security hygiene.

🪙 ERC-20 Token Standard: Architecture and Design

Understanding token allowances requires understanding the ERC-20 standard—the interface that defines fungible tokens on Ethereum and EVM-compatible chains.

ERC-20 Interface Overview

📋 Core ERC-20 Functions

Required Functions (6 total):

// Balance and Supply
function totalSupply() public view returns (uint256)
function balanceOf(address account) public view returns (uint256)

// Direct Transfers
function transfer(address recipient, uint256 amount) public returns (bool)

// Approval System (The Critical Part)
function approve(address spender, uint256 amount) public returns (bool)
function allowance(address owner, address spender) public view returns (uint256)
function transferFrom(address sender, address recipient, uint256 amount) public returns (bool)

Key Events:

event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value)
event Approval(address indexed owner, address indexed spender, uint256 value)

Transfer vs. TransferFrom: Two Spending Models

🔀 Direct vs. Delegated Transfers

transfer() – Direct Spending

Use Case: User directly sends tokens to another address

Example: Alice sends 100 USDC to Bob

USDC.transfer(Bob, 100e6)  // Alice calls this directly
  • Caller must be token owner: Only Alice can call this to send Alice’s tokens
  • No approval needed: Direct control—you own tokens, you send them
  • Simple and safe: No delegation involved

approve() + transferFrom() – Delegated Spending

Use Case: User authorizes smart contract to spend tokens on their behalf

Example: Alice approves Uniswap to swap her 100 USDC for ETH

// Step 1: Alice approves Uniswap
USDC.approve(UniswapRouter, 100e6)

// Step 2: Uniswap calls transferFrom to pull Alice's tokens
USDC.transferFrom(Alice, UniswapRouter, 100e6)  // Uniswap calls this
  • Two-step process: (1) Owner approves spender, (2) Spender pulls tokens
  • Enables DeFi: DEXs, lending, staking all require this pattern
  • Security risk: Approval persists until revoked—malicious spender can drain at any time

Why Approvals Are Necessary

✅ The Design Rationale

Problem: How can smart contracts interact with user tokens without holding custody?

Solution: Two-step approval + transferFrom pattern

  1. User maintains custody: Tokens stay in user’s wallet, not deposited to contract
  2. Smart contract functionality: Contract can execute complex logic (swaps, liquidations, yield farming) using user’s tokens
  3. Non-custodial DeFi: Protocols don’t hold your funds—they just have permission to use them when you interact

Real-World Example: Uniswap Swap

  1. User approves Uniswap Router to spend USDC
  2. User calls swap function: swapExactTokensForTokens()
  3. Uniswap Router uses transferFrom to pull approved USDC from user
  4. Router swaps USDC → ETH in liquidity pool
  5. Router sends ETH back to user
  6. User’s USDC never custodied by Uniswap—just pulled when needed

🔐 The approve() Function: Technical Deep Dive

The approve() function is where token security vulnerability begins. Understanding its mechanics is essential for safe DeFi usage.

approve() Function Signature and Behavior

📝 approve() Technical Specification

Function Signature:

function approve(address spender, uint256 amount) 
    public returns (bool)

Parameters:

  • spender: Address of smart contract (or account) authorized to spend tokens
  • amount: Maximum number of tokens spender can transfer from your address

Internal State Change:

// Stored in token contract's state
mapping(address => mapping(address => uint256)) private _allowances;

// When you call approve()
_allowances[msg.sender][spender] = amount;

// Emits event
emit Approval(msg.sender, spender, amount);

Key Properties:

  • Overwrites previous approval: Calling approve() again replaces old amount with new amount
  • Per-spender tracking: Can have different allowances for different spenders simultaneously
  • Persistent: Approval remains until explicitly changed (revoked or updated)
  • Token-specific: USDC approval doesn’t affect DAI—each token contract maintains own allowances

How transferFrom() Consumes Allowance

🔄 The Spending Mechanism

transferFrom() Implementation:

function transferFrom(address sender, address recipient, uint256 amount) 
    public returns (bool) {
    
    // Check allowance
    uint256 currentAllowance = _allowances[sender][msg.sender];
    require(currentAllowance >= amount, "ERC20: insufficient allowance");
    
    // Decrease allowance
    unchecked {
        _approve(sender, msg.sender, currentAllowance - amount);
    }
    
    // Transfer tokens
    _transfer(sender, recipient, amount);
    
    return true;
}

Step-by-Step Execution:

  1. Check allowance: Contract verifies msg.sender (caller) has sufficient allowance from sender
  2. Decrease allowance: Subtract transferred amount from stored allowance
  3. Transfer tokens: Move tokens from sender to recipient
  4. Emit events: Approval event (updated allowance) + Transfer event

Example:

  • Alice approves Uniswap for 1000 USDC: approve(Uniswap, 1000e6)
  • Uniswap swaps 500 USDC: transferFrom(Alice, UniswapPool, 500e6)
  • Remaining allowance: 500 USDC (automatically decremented)
  • Uniswap can still spend 500 more USDC without new approval

Checking Current Allowances

🔍 Querying Allowances Programmatically

allowance() Function:

function allowance(address owner, address spender) 
    public view returns (uint256)

Usage Example:

// Check how much Uniswap can spend of Alice's USDC
uint256 allowedAmount = USDC.allowance(AliceAddress, UniswapRouter);

// Returns current allowance (in token's smallest unit)
// 0 = no approval
// 2^256-1 = unlimited approval

Note: This is a view function (read-only, no gas cost). Can be called by anyone to check any owner→spender allowance publicly.

🚨 The Unlimited Approval Problem

The most dangerous practice in DeFi is granting unlimited token approvals. Understanding why this happens and its consequences is critical.

What is an Unlimited Approval?

⚠️ The Magic Number: 2^256 – 1

Unlimited Approval Value:

uint256 MAX = 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639935

// In hex (more commonly seen)
uint256 MAX = 0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

// Shorthand in Solidity
uint256 MAX = type(uint256).max;

What it means:

  • Effectively infinite: 2^256-1 ≈ 10^77 tokens—more than atoms in observable universe
  • Never decrements: Most implementations detect MAX and skip allowance reduction (gas optimization)
  • Permanent permission: Contract can spend ANY amount of your tokens, at ANY time, forever
  • No limit checking: Spender never needs new approval—can drain entire balance in one transaction

Why Do Users Grant Unlimited Approvals?

🤔 The UX vs Security Trade-off

User Perspective (Why it happens):

  1. Gas savings: Approve once forever vs re-approve every trade (saves ~$2-20 per approval depending on gas prices)
  2. Convenience: Don’t want to approve every time using a dApp
  3. Default behavior: Most dApp interfaces default to unlimited approvals (1inch, Uniswap, etc.)
  4. Lack of awareness: Users don’t understand security implications of infinite permission

DApp Perspective (Why they encourage it):

  1. Better UX: Seamless multi-swap experience without interruption
  2. Competitive pressure: If competitors offer unlimited approvals, must match or lose users
  3. Reduced support burden: Fewer “why do I need to approve again?” tickets
  4. Implementation simplicity: Don’t need to track remaining allowances or prompt re-approval

Reality: The entire DeFi industry has normalized a practice that violates principle of least privilege—granting far more permission than necessary for immediate need.

Security Implications of Unlimited Approvals

💀 Attack Scenarios Enabled by Unlimited Approvals

1. Smart Contract Exploit

Scenario: You approve Uniswap for unlimited USDC. Six months later, Uniswap contract has critical vulnerability discovered.

Impact: Attacker exploits vulnerability to call transferFrom() from your address, draining all USDC.

Real Example: Poly Network hack (2021) – $600M stolen via cross-chain bridge vulnerability. Users with unlimited approvals to bridge contract were drained.

2. Private Key Compromise

Scenario: Contract owner’s private key stolen (rug pull, inside job, phishing).

Impact: Attacker updates contract to malicious version (if upgradeable), or adds backdoor function to drain approved tokens.

Real Example: Numerous DeFi protocol rug pulls where team multisig adds malicious upgrade draining all user approvals.

3. Phishing Approval

Scenario: User visits fake dApp clone (uniswap.com vs uniswaρ.com with Unicode). Approves malicious contract thinking it’s legitimate.

Impact: Immediate drain of all tokens user approved. Common in NFT “free mint” scams.

Real Example: BadgerDAO frontend hack (2021) – $120M stolen after attackers injected malicious approval requests into official website.

4. Forgotten Approvals

Scenario: User approved experimental DeFi protocol 2 years ago. Protocol abandoned/compromised. User forgot approval exists.

Impact: Years later, attacker discovers old approval, drains tokens.

Prevalence: Average active DeFi user has 50-100 forgotten approvals. Each is a sleeping vulnerability.

🎯 Token Draining Attack Vectors

Understanding how attackers exploit approvals helps recognize malicious patterns and protect against them.

Attack Taxonomy

🔴 Category 1: Direct Approval Exploits

A. Phishing Approval Requests

Attack Flow:

  1. Attacker creates fake dApp (clone of Uniswap, OpenSea, etc.)
  2. User connects wallet to malicious site
  3. Site requests approval for attacker-controlled contract
  4. Wallet shows approval request—user thinks it’s normal dApp interaction
  5. User approves (grants unlimited permission to malicious contract)
  6. Malicious contract immediately calls transferFrom() to drain tokens

Detection: Always verify spender address in approval transaction. If unknown address, REJECT.

B. Malicious Token Contracts

Attack Flow:

  1. Attacker creates fake token with backdoor in transferFrom()
  2. Victim receives airdrop of fake token (shows in wallet with $10,000 value)
  3. Victim tries to sell on DEX → prompted to approve DEX for fake token
  4. Approval transaction actually approves attacker’s contract to spend victim’s REAL tokens (USDC, DAI, ETH)
  5. Attacker drains real tokens immediately

Mechanism: Malicious approve() function approves different spender than intended. Always verify contract code before interacting.

C. Compromised dApp Frontend

Attack Flow:

  1. Attacker compromises legitimate dApp’s frontend (BadgerDAO 2021 example)
  2. Injects malicious code that replaces approval requests
  3. User visits real website, but code has been modified
  4. User approves thinking it’s normal interaction
  5. Actually approved malicious contract—tokens drained

Defense: Use hardware wallet with transaction verification. Display shows ACTUAL contract address being approved, not what website claims.

🔴 Category 2: Smart Contract Vulnerabilities

A. Reentrancy Attacks

Vulnerability: Contract calls external code before updating state, allowing recursive calls to drain tokens.

Exploitation: If contract has user approvals and vulnerable transferFrom() logic, attacker can drain all approved tokens via reentrancy.

B. Logic Errors

Vulnerability: Flawed access control, incorrect allowance tracking, missing validation checks.

Example: Contract allows anyone to call transferFrom() without proper allowance check—drains all approved tokens.

C. Upgradeable Contract Risks

Vulnerability: Contract is upgradeable (proxy pattern). Admin can replace logic with malicious version.

Exploitation: Compromised admin key → upgrade contract to version with backdoor transferFrom() → drain all approved tokens.

Prevalence: Many DeFi protocols are upgradeable. If approval granted, trust admin keys forever.

Real-World Case Studies

📚 Major Approval-Based Hacks

1. BadgerDAO Frontend Injection (Dec 2021) – $120M

  • Attack: Cloudflare account compromised → malicious script injected into frontend
  • Mechanism: Script replaced legitimate approval requests with malicious ones
  • Impact: 186 victims lost tokens after unknowingly approving malicious contract
  • Lesson: Even legitimate dApps can serve malicious approvals if frontend compromised

2. Poly Network Bridge Hack (Aug 2021) – $600M

  • Attack: Cross-chain bridge contract vulnerability exploited
  • Mechanism: Attacker gained control of bridge contract, called transferFrom() on all approved tokens
  • Impact: Drained tokens from users with unlimited bridge approvals
  • Lesson: Cross-chain bridges are high-risk approval targets—unlimited approvals extremely dangerous

3. NFT Phishing Campaigns (2022-2024) – $200M+

  • Attack: Fake “free mint” websites request setApprovalForAll() for NFTs
  • Mechanism: Approval grants malicious contract permission to transfer ALL user’s NFTs
  • Impact: Valuable Bored Apes, CryptoPunks stolen after users approved fake minting contract
  • Lesson: NFT approvals (ERC-721 setApprovalForAll) even more dangerous than ERC-20—single approval = all NFTs at risk

🔍 Checking Your Token Allowances

The first step in securing your assets is auditing existing approvals. Multiple tools make this easy, even for non-technical users.

Method 1: Etherscan Token Approval Checker

🌐 Using Etherscan (Ethereum Mainnet)

Step-by-Step Process:

  1. Navigate to Etherscan: Visit https://etherscan.io
  2. Access Token Approvals Tool:
    • In top menu: More → Token Approvals
    • Direct URL: https://etherscan.io/tokenapprovalchecker
  3. Enter Your Address:
    • Paste your Ethereum address (0x…)
    • Or connect wallet (MetaMask, WalletConnect)
    • Click “Search”
  4. Review Results:
    • Table displays: Token Name, Spender Address, Approved Amount
    • Filter by ERC-20 tokens, ERC-721 NFTs, or ERC-1155 assets
    • Sort by approval date, amount, or token

What to Look For:

  • Unlimited approvals: Shows as “Unlimited” or very large number (115792…)
  • Unknown spenders: Contract addresses you don’t recognize
  • Old approvals: Protocols you haven’t used in months/years
  • High-value tokens: Priority: USDC, USDT, DAI, WETH, WBTC—focus on revoking these first

Method 2: Revoke.cash (Multi-Chain)

✅ Using Revoke.cash (Recommended)

Why Revoke.cash:

  • Multi-chain support: Ethereum, BSC, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, Fantom, 40+ chains
  • User-friendly interface: Cleaner UI than Etherscan, better sorting/filtering
  • Risk indicators: Highlights suspicious contracts, shows exploit history
  • Batch revocation: Revoke multiple approvals in single transaction (Gnosis Safe integration)

Step-by-Step Process:

  1. Visit Website: https://revoke.cash
  2. Connect Wallet:
    • Click “Connect Wallet”
    • Select wallet type (MetaMask, WalletConnect, Coinbase Wallet, etc.)
    • Approve connection
  3. Select Network:
    • Top-right dropdown: Choose blockchain (Ethereum, Polygon, etc.)
    • Switch wallet network if prompted
  4. Review Approvals:
    • All active approvals displayed automatically
    • Grouped by: ERC-20 Tokens, NFTs (ERC-721), Multi-Tokens (ERC-1155)
    • Shows: Token, Spender, Approved Amount, Last Updated
  5. Filter & Sort:
    • Search box: Find specific token or spender
    • Filter: “Unlimited only”, “High value”, “Old approvals”
    • Sort: By date, amount, token balance, risk level

Key Features:

  • Risk warnings: Red flag for known exploited contracts
  • Balance shown: See current token balance vs approved amount
  • USD values: Approximate dollar value of approval exposure
  • Contract verification: Links to Etherscan for spender contract inspection

Method 3: Other Tools and Alternatives

Tool Networks Features Best For
Etherscan Ethereum only Official, comprehensive data Ethereum mainnet deep analysis
Revoke.cash 40+ chains Best UI, risk indicators, batch revoke Multi-chain users, beginners
Approved.zone 15+ chains Similar to Revoke, alternative interface Second opinion, Revoke alternative
Unrekt.net Ethereum, L2s Security-focused, exploit tracking Security-conscious users
De.Fi Scanner Multi-chain Portfolio tracking + approval management All-in-one portfolio + security

🛡️ Step-by-Step Revocation Guide

Revoking dangerous approvals is the most important action you can take to secure your tokens. Here’s exactly how to do it.

Revoke Walkthrough: Using Revoke.cash

🔧 Complete Revocation Process

Step 1: Identify Dangerous Approvals

  1. Connect wallet to Revoke.cash
  2. Review all approvals displayed
  3. Priority targets:
    • ⚠️ Red-flagged contracts (known exploits)
    • 🚨 Unlimited approvals to old/unused protocols
    • 💰 High-value tokens (USDC, ETH, WBTC) with unlimited approvals
    • ❓ Unknown contract addresses
    • ⏰ Approvals >6 months old you don’t actively use

Step 2: Revoke Individual Approval

  1. Click “Revoke” button next to approval you want to remove
  2. Wallet popup appears requesting transaction confirmation
  3. Transaction details:
    • To: Token contract address (e.g., USDC contract)
    • Function: approve(spender, 0)
    • This sets allowance to ZERO—revoking all permission
  4. Review transaction carefully:
    • Verify you’re calling legitimate token contract (check Etherscan)
    • Confirm spender is the address you intend to revoke
    • Ensure amount being set is 0 (complete revocation)
  5. Approve transaction in wallet
  6. Wait for confirmation (~30 seconds on Ethereum)
  7. Verify: Refresh Revoke.cash—approval should disappear

Step 3: Batch Revocation (Optional)

  1. For multiple approvals: Use Gnosis Safe + Revoke.cash integration
  2. Or: Revoke one-by-one (each costs gas—approximately 30,000-50,000 gas per revoke)
  3. Gas cost estimation:
    • Ethereum mainnet: $2-20 per revoke (depending on gas price)
    • Polygon: $0.01-0.10 per revoke
    • Consider gas costs vs risk exposure

Step 4: Update Approval to Limited Amount (Alternative)

Instead of revoking completely, can set specific limit:

  1. Click “Update” instead of “Revoke”
  2. Enter specific amount (e.g., 100 USDC instead of unlimited)
  3. Approve transaction
  4. Benefit: Can still use protocol without re-approving, but limits exposure
  5. Trade-off: Need to update approval again when limit exhausted

Hardware Wallet Revocation

🔐 Revoking with Ledger/Trezor

Process:

  1. Connect hardware wallet to computer
  2. Open Revoke.cash or Etherscan Token Approval Checker
  3. Connect via Ledger Live or Trezor Suite
  4. Identify approvals to revoke
  5. Click “Revoke”
  6. Hardware wallet displays transaction:
    • Contract address being called (token contract)
    • Function: approve(spender, 0)
    • Spender address
    • Amount: 0
  7. Verify on device screen:
    • Confirm token contract is correct
    • Confirm spender is address you want to revoke
    • Confirm amount is 0 (full revocation)
  8. Approve on hardware device (physical button press)
  9. Transaction broadcast and confirmed

Advantage: Hardware wallet shows ACTUAL transaction data—can’t be manipulated by malware or compromised website. Provides authoritative verification.

Manual Revocation via Etherscan Write Contract

⚙️ Advanced: Direct Contract Interaction

For advanced users who want maximum control:

  1. Go to Etherscan
  2. Navigate to token contract (e.g., USDC: 0xA0b86991c6218b36c1d19D4a2e9Eb0cE3606eB48)
  3. Click “Contract” tab
  4. Click “Write Contract”
  5. Connect wallet (“Connect to Web3”)
  6. Find approve function
  7. Enter parameters:
    • spender: Address of contract to revoke (e.g., Uniswap Router)
    • amount: 0 (to revoke) or specific limit
  8. Click “Write”
  9. Confirm transaction in wallet

Benefit: No third-party website dependency. Direct interaction with token contract. Maximum transparency.

🛡️ Prevention Best Practices

The best defense is avoiding dangerous approvals in the first place. Implement these practices to minimize exposure.

Approval Hygiene Principles

✅ Golden Rules for Safe Approvals

1. Never Grant Unlimited Approvals

  • Always approve exact amount needed: Swapping 100 USDC? Approve 100 USDC, not unlimited.
  • Modify dApp defaults: Most interfaces default to unlimited—manually change to specific amount
  • MetaMask/Wallet settings: Some wallets allow setting default approval limits
  • Yes, this costs more gas: Pay $5 extra in gas to avoid $50,000 loss

2. Regular Approval Audits

  • Monthly check: Visit Revoke.cash every month, review all approvals
  • After major use: After testing new DeFi protocol, immediately audit new approvals
  • Revoke unused: If haven’t used protocol in 3-6 months, revoke
  • Calendar reminder: Set recurring reminder “Check token approvals”

3. Verify Before Approving

  • Check spender address: Does it match official protocol contract? (Verify on Etherscan, official docs)
  • Research unknown contracts: If address unfamiliar, search on Etherscan—is it verified? Has activity? Is code audited?
  • Hardware wallet verification: Always review approval details on hardware device screen
  • When in doubt, reject: Better to miss transaction than approve malicious contract

4. Use Separate Wallets

  • Hot wallet for DeFi: Small amounts for active trading/testing
  • Cold wallet for holding: Large holdings never grant approvals (never spend, only receive)
  • Experimental wallet: Separate wallet for trying new/risky protocols
  • Benefit: If hot wallet compromised via approval, cold wallet untouched

Red Flags: When to Reject Approval

🚩 Immediate Rejection Criteria

Reject approval request if ANY of these apply:

  • 🚫 Spender address is unfamiliar and you can’t verify its legitimacy
  • 🚫 Requested during unexpected moment (not actively using dApp)
  • 🚫 Multiple approval requests in quick succession
  • 🚫 Approval for token you don’t own or didn’t interact with
  • 🚫 Free NFT mint or airdrop claim requiring token approval (almost always scam)
  • 🚫 Website URL doesn’t exactly match official (check for typos, Unicode tricks)
  • 🚫 Hardware wallet shows different contract address than website claims
  • 🚫 Social media DM with link requesting approval (“claim rewards”, “migrate tokens”)
  • 🚫 Urgent pressure (“approve now or lose access”, “limited time offer”)
  • 🚫 Contract is not verified on Etherscan (no green checkmark)

DeFi-Specific Best Practices

🏦 Protocol-by-Protocol Guidance

DEXs (Uniswap, SushiSwap, 1inch):

  • Approve exact swap amount, not unlimited
  • If frequent trader: Approve slightly more to reduce re-approvals (e.g., approve 1000 USDC if trading 100 at a time)
  • Revoke after large swaps (if not planning to trade again soon)

Lending Protocols (Aave, Compound):

  • Approve deposit amount only (not unlimited)
  • If leaving funds deposited long-term: Unlimited approval may be acceptable (protocol is audited, high TVL)
  • Revoke when withdrawing all funds

Staking/Yield Farming:

  • Approve only amount being staked
  • Especially careful with new/experimental farms (high rug risk)
  • Revoke immediately after unstaking

NFT Marketplaces (OpenSea, Blur):

  • setApprovalForAll(): Grants permission to transfer ALL NFTs—extremely dangerous
  • Only approve when actively listing NFT for sale
  • Revoke immediately after sale completes or if canceling listing
  • NEVER approve unknown marketplace contracts

🔧 Tools Comparison and Recommendations

Choosing the right tool for managing approvals depends on your needs, technical level, and which chains you use.

Feature Comparison Matrix

Feature Etherscan Revoke.cash Approved.zone De.Fi
Multi-Chain Support No (per-chain explorers) 40+ chains 15+ chains 20+ chains
User Interface Basic, functional Excellent, intuitive Good, clean Complex (portfolio focus)
Risk Indicators No Yes (exploit history) Yes (security scores) Yes (with scanner)
Batch Revocation No Yes (Gnosis Safe) No Limited
USD Valuation No Yes Yes Yes
Wallet Connection Optional Required Required Required
Best For Ethereum deep-dive General users, multi-chain Alternative to Revoke Portfolio + approvals
Cost Free Free Free Free (premium features paid)

Recommendation by User Type

👤 User Profiles and Tool Recommendations

Beginner DeFi User:

  • Primary tool: Revoke.cash (easiest interface, clear risk indicators)
  • Frequency: Check monthly or after using new protocol
  • Strategy: Revoke everything you’re not actively using

Active DeFi Trader:

  • Primary tool: Revoke.cash for management + De.Fi for portfolio tracking
  • Frequency: Check weekly, especially when trying new protocols
  • Strategy: Keep approvals for frequently-used protocols (Uniswap, Aave), revoke experimental ones

Multi-Chain Power User:

  • Primary tool: Revoke.cash (best multi-chain support)
  • Secondary: Chain-specific explorers for deep analysis
  • Frequency: Daily/weekly depending on activity
  • Strategy: Separate hot wallets per chain, aggressive revocation policy

Security-Focused User:

  • Primary tool: Etherscan Write Contract (direct interaction, no third-party website)
  • Secondary: Revoke.cash for convenience
  • Frequency: Check after every DeFi interaction
  • Strategy: Zero unlimited approvals, revoke immediately after each use, hardware wallet verification mandatory

🎯 Key Takeaways: Token Allowance Security

Understanding Approvals

  • approve() grants spending permission: Allows smart contracts to call transferFrom() and spend your tokens
  • Necessary for DeFi: DEXs, lending, staking all require approvals—can’t function without this pattern
  • Persistent permission: Approvals remain active until explicitly revoked—don’t expire automatically
  • Per-spender tracking: Each contract has separate allowance—can approve multiple contracts for same token

The Unlimited Approval Problem

  • 2^256-1 = infinite permission: Most common approval value—allows spending unlimited tokens forever
  • $2B+ stolen via approvals: Exploited contracts, phishing, rug pulls all abuse unlimited approvals
  • Normalized bad practice: Industry defaults to unlimited approvals for UX—prioritizes convenience over security
  • Forgotten approvals everywhere: Average user has 50-100 active approvals they don’t remember granting

Attack Vectors

  • Phishing approval requests: Fake dApps trick users into approving malicious contracts
  • Compromised contracts: Legitimate protocols get exploited—approved users drained
  • Malicious tokens: Fake token approve() functions steal real tokens
  • Frontend attacks: BadgerDAO-style injection serving malicious approvals from real websites

Protection Strategy

  • Never grant unlimited approvals: Always approve exact amount needed—pay extra gas for security
  • Monthly approval audits: Use Revoke.cash or Etherscan to check all active approvals
  • Revoke unused approvals: If haven’t used protocol in 3-6 months, revoke immediately
  • Verify before approving: Check spender address, research contract, use hardware wallet verification
  • Separate wallets: Hot wallet for DeFi (small amounts), cold wallet for holding (never approve)

Tools and Resources

  • Revoke.cash: Best all-around tool—40+ chains, great UI, risk indicators
  • Etherscan Token Approval Checker: Official Ethereum tool, comprehensive data
  • Approved.zone, De.Fi, Unrekt: Alternative tools with different features
  • Hardware wallets essential: Only way to trustlessly verify approval transactions

XColdPro: Transaction Verification at Approval Time

XColdPro’s air-gapped architecture provides critical protection during approval transactions. Every approve() call displays on trusted device screen: token contract address, spender contract address, exact approval amount. Users see raw transaction data—not what potentially compromised website claims.

Approval Safety: Even if phishing site or malware requests malicious approval, XColdPro shows ACTUAL contract addresses being approved. Users can cross-reference with Etherscan, official docs, or reject immediately. Blind approval signing becomes impossible—verification is mandatory before signature generation.

The Approval Paradox: Token approvals enable non-custodial DeFi—the killer feature of decentralized finance. Yet they’re also the primary attack vector for billions in losses. The solution isn’t avoiding DeFi—it’s practicing approval hygiene: never grant unlimited permissions, audit regularly, revoke aggressively, verify everything. Your tokens are only as secure as your least-secure approval. Audit yours today. 🔐

📚 Part of the XColdPro DeFi Security Series

Next Article: “Smart Contract Security: Reading and Understanding DeFi Protocol Code Before Interacting”

Share the Post:

Related Posts